Change "if appropriate and not in conflict with product or organizational standards."
In the Sprint Retrospective section of the Scrum Guide it says "During each Sprint Retrospective, the Scrum Team plans ways to increase product quality by improving work processes or adapting the definition of "Done", if appropriate and not in conflict with product or organizational standards."
I feel that the words "if appropriate and not in conflict with product or organizational standards." are driven by corporate bureaucracy thinking and pressures from corporates on Scrum.
What happens if those "standards" are the essence of what is destroying Scrum? If those standards are the things that are impeding the team, surely they should be attempting to address them.
This is command-and-control thinking; your basically saying "Hey team, go do continuous improvement as long as you do it my way". This is hamstringing the team and possibly the organisation in the name of "compliance" and "governance"
1 commentComments are closed
Brett Maytom commented
Also, it goes against the Scrum values of "courage". The courage to challenge those standards. It goes against the spirit of "commitment"; the commitment to continuously improve.
Ken, Jeff ... please don't corporatize Scrum. Keep it simple and pure.