Karol Grodzicki

My feedback

  1. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      Karol Grodzicki supported this idea  · 
      Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

      Actually, it can be interpreted in 3 ways:
      1. ...responsible for maximizing the value of product and maximizing the work
      2. ... responsible for maximizing the value product and responsible for the work
      3. ... maximizing the value of product and value of work

      Anyway, it should be fixed.
      I would put it: "The Product Owner is responsible for maximising the value of the product and the value of the work of the development team."
      But it suggests that these are 2 different values (and in fact it's one value of product created with this work).

    • 2 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

        in Polish version there is no "only". Just "SM enforces that Development team attend Daily Scrum".

      • 3 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

          In team distributed among many timezones it might be even 24 h

        • 6 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

            Polish translation has "selected elements of Product Backlog" there. This is what authors might mean.

          • 4 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

              I guess this is mainly the idea of Scrum Primer. Scrum Guide is rather a definition and examples could make more problems than help

            • 2 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

                burn-downs are mentioned, but these are supporting methods, not part of Scrum. Scrum Guide should be kept as simple and short as possible, so I think that's enough

                For some supporting Scrum methods I would suggest to see Scrum Primer or some books about Scrum.

              • 27 votes
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

                  That's a good idea ;) BTW, some effects of retrospectives could also be treated as even less formal agreements.

                  Karol Grodzicki supported this idea  · 
                • 3 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

                    No one should be forced to use 100% accurate Scrum. You can always adapt it (Scrum-but), use other method (Kan-ban) or mix Scrum with something else (Scrum-ban). Scrum is just the way some people (like Ken Schwaber) suggest to do it. It's generally good, but in some cases you can adapt it. Scrum-buts shouldn't be called Scrums, but it doesn't mean they're bad.

                    If you write in Scrum Guide that all of the Scrum practices are changeable you describe in fact a do-what-you-think-is-right method. We don't really need a word for that...

                    That's why I see no problem in current situation - different organizations suggest different methods and call it with different names. And people use them as they want.

                  • 7 votes
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

                      I still prefer the diagram from Scrum Primer...

                    • 165 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        21 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

                        There is already PB Refinement mentioned in Scrum Guide (page 13). I don't see a point in making an event of that - many teams work without such an event and still it's great Scrum.
                        However, Backlog Refinement workshop could be mentioned as an example of Backlog Refinement implementation.

                      Feedback and Knowledge Base