Karol Grodzicki

My feedback

  1. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    in Polish version there is no "only". Just "SM enforces that Development team attend Daily Scrum".

  2. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    In team distributed among many timezones it might be even 24 h

  3. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    Polish translation has "selected elements of Product Backlog" there. This is what authors might mean.

  4. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    I guess this is mainly the idea of Scrum Primer. Scrum Guide is rather a definition and examples could make more problems than help

  5. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    burn-downs are mentioned, but these are supporting methods, not part of Scrum. Scrum Guide should be kept as simple and short as possible, so I think that's enough

    For some supporting Scrum methods I would suggest to see Scrum Primer or some books about Scrum.

  6. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    That's a good idea ;) BTW, some effects of retrospectives could also be treated as even less formal agreements.

    Karol Grodzicki supported this idea  · 
  7. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    No one should be forced to use 100% accurate Scrum. You can always adapt it (Scrum-but), use other method (Kan-ban) or mix Scrum with something else (Scrum-ban). Scrum is just the way some people (like Ken Schwaber) suggest to do it. It's generally good, but in some cases you can adapt it. Scrum-buts shouldn't be called Scrums, but it doesn't mean they're bad.

    If you write in Scrum Guide that all of the Scrum practices are changeable you describe in fact a do-what-you-think-is-right method. We don't really need a word for that...

    That's why I see no problem in current situation - different organizations suggest different methods and call it with different names. And people use them as they want.

  8. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Karol Grodzicki commented  · 

    I still prefer the diagram from Scrum Primer...

Feedback and Knowledge Base